← All software
Alibaba's open-weight cinematic video model with affordable pay-per-generation.
Pros
- Open-weight options enable self-hosting/customization
- Very affordable pay-per-generation pricing
- Native audio and strong cinematic motion
Cons
- No unified first-party subscription; access via third parties
- Quality slightly behind Veo/Kling flagships
- Fragmented ecosystem and versioning
✓ Where it shines / best for
- Developers and tinkerers wanting open weights
- Cost-sensitive pay-per-clip generation
- Self-hosted or custom pipeline builds
✕ Not the best fit for
- Non-technical users wanting a simple subscription UI
- Enterprises needing a single vendor SLA
- Those requiring top-tier polished output
Features
- ✓ Text-to-video and image-to-video (Wan 2.5+)
- ✓ Native audio sync and multi-shot coherence
- ✓ Up to 1080p (native 4K rolling out)
- ✓ Open-weight variants for self-hosting
- ✓ Multiple aspect ratios for social/pro
- ✓ Pay-per-generation across many API providers
- ✓ Also offers image and editing tools
- ✓ Newer Wan 2.6/2.7 with longer clips and frame control
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Billing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| API (Wan 2.5 Fast 720p) | ~$0.068/sec | usage | Via WaveSpeed; ~$0.34 for a 5s 720p clip, no subscription |
| API (Wan 2.5 Fast 1080p) | ~$0.102/sec | usage | Via WaveSpeed pay-per-generation; ~$0.51 for a 5s 1080p clip |
| API (standard quality tiers) | ~$0.25-$1.50 per clip | usage | Per-generation pricing varies by resolution (480p/720p/1080p) and clip length across providers |
| Open weights | $0 (self-host) | one-time | Open-source variants; pay only for your own compute |
Pricing verified from the official source. Prices change often — confirm on the vendor's site before buying.
Sponsored
A full review is being generated for this product and will appear here shortly.